Figma Sites vs. Framer — One Project, Two Platforms — Who Wins?

Introduction

The introduction of Figma Sites and its competition with Framer in the no-code website builder space has sparked interest among designers. This article aims to compare the two platforms by analyzing the experience of building the same website project in both tools.

Comparison Analysis

Project Recreation

• The author's Framer Template was used to recreate the project in both Figma Sites and Framer.
• Figma Sites seemed to have an advantage due to its simplicity and ease of use in recreating the website project.

User Experience

• Figma Sites offered a more intuitive and user-friendly experience compared to Framer.
• Framer, known for its design-focused approach, had some limitations in terms of user experience.

Features and Customization

• Figma Sites provided a wide range of customization options, making it easier to achieve the desired design for the website.
• Framer, on the other hand, had a more limited set of features, which could be a drawback for designers looking for more customization options.

Client Readiness

• While both platforms have their strengths, Figma Sites seemed more ready for client work due to its user-friendly interface and feature set.
• Framer, with its design-centric approach, may require more customization and time investment to meet client expectations.

Conclusion

Based on the comparison analysis, Figma Sites appears to have an edge over Framer in terms of user experience, features, and client readiness. While Framer is known for its design-focused approach, Figma Sites' simplicity and ease of use make it a strong contender in the no-code website builder space. Designers looking for a user-friendly platform with a wide range of customization options may find Figma Sites to be the more suitable choice for their projects.