LogRocket Blog

gRPC vs REST: Choosing the best API design approach

thumbnail

gRPC vs REST: Choosing the best API design approach

TL;DR: Should I choose gRPC or REST?

Choose REST when simplicity, broad compatibility, and human readability are priorities for your application.

Key characteristics of REST

  • Follows standard HTTP methods and status codes
  • Stateless communications
  • Resource-oriented architecture
  • Human-readable payloads (typically JSON)
  • Widely accepted across browsers and other platforms

Example REST endpoint response

{
  "message": "Hello, World!"
}

What is gRPC (gRPC Remote Procedure Call)?

gRPC is Google’s high-performance RPC framework.

Key characteristics of gRPC

  • Built on HTTP/2 (multiplexing, server push, header compression)
  • Uses Protocol Buffers for efficient binary serialization
  • Strong typing through service definitions
  • Bidirectional streaming support
  • Code generation for multiple languages

Example gRPC service definition

service Greeter {
  rpc SayHello (HelloRequest) returns (HelloResponse) {}
}

Under the hood: gRPC and HTTP/2

One of gRPC’s most significant technical advantages is its use of HTTP/2 as a transport protocol. Understanding the technical details of HTTP/2 helps explain why gRPC offers substantial performance benefits.

Technical advantages for gRPC

  • Efficient parsing
  • Low overhead
  • Reduced latency
  • Multiplexing

Performance comparison

Serialization and payload size

| | REST | gRPC | |---------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| | Serialization | Uses text-based formats (JSON/XML) | Uses binary Protocol Buffers | | Payload size | Larger due to text encoding | Typically 30-40% smaller than JSON | | Serialization speed | Slower | Faster |

Network performance

  • REST primarily uses HTTP/1.1
  • gRPC is built on HTTP/2
  • Multiplexing in gRPC reduces latency

Benchmarks

In typical scenarios, gRPC outperforms REST in several metrics:

  • Throughput
  • Latency
  • CPU load
  • Network utilization

Key advantages comparison

REST advantages over gRPC

  • Full browser-level support
  • Easy to learn and implement
  • Large ecosystem and tooling
  • Abundant libraries and middleware
  • Extensive documentation
  • Well-established security practices

gRPC Advantages Over REST

  • Performance
  • Strong contract definition
  • Streaming capabilities
  • Code generation
  • Type safety across programming languages

When to choose REST

  • Public APIs
  • Browser-based applications
  • Simple CRUD operations
  • Microservices with diverse language needs
  • Human-readable debugging

Example REST-based system

When to choose gRPC

  • Microservices architecture
  • Polyglot environments
  • Real-time communication
  • Low latency and high throughput systems
  • IoT and mobile apps

Example gRPC-based system

Implementation examples

  • REST implementation (Node.js/Express)
  • gRPC implementation (Node.js)

Final verdict: REST or gRPC?

Here are key factors to consider for your project:

  • Client requirements
  • Decision flowchart
  • Hybrid approaches
  • Progressive migration
  • Domain-based selection

Conclusion

Both API patterns have their place in modern software architecture. REST, with its simplicity and broad compatibility, remains the go-to choice for public APIs and browser-based applications.