articleschannelstagsspacestoolkit
LogRocket Blog

Top 5 Next.js alternatives for React developers

    View Original
    thumbnail

    Top 5 Next.js Alternatives for React Developers

    1. Remix

    • Best for: Full-stack apps with built-in form/data primitives
    • React Support: Yes
    • SSR Support: Yes
    • Routing: File-based + loaders/actions
    • Data Loading: Loaders + actions (built-in)
    • Type Safety: Yes
    • Drawbacks: Less mature SSR support compared to Next.js

    2. Astro

    • Best for: Content-heavy static or hybrid sites
    • React Support: Partial
    • SSR Support: Yes (newer)
    • Routing: File-based with islands
    • Data Loading: JS fetch in Astro components
    • Type Safety: No
    • Drawbacks: Not ideal for highly interactive SPAs or complex dashboards

    3. TanStack Start

    • Best for: Fully type-safe full-stack React apps
    • React Support: Yes
    • SSR Support: Yes (full stack)
    • Routing: File-based via TanStack Router
    • Data Loading: Server functions + typed loaders
    • Type Safety: Yes
    • Drawbacks: Still in beta, some features may change

    4. Vike

    • Best for: Full control over SSR/SSG with minimal abstraction
    • React Support: Yes
    • SSR Support: Yes
    • Routing: Convention-based (+Page.tsx)
    • Data Loading: Custom server Hooks (onBeforeRender)
    • Type Safety: Yes
    • Drawbacks: No built-in data layer, requires explicit configuration

    5. Vite + React Router

    • Best for: Lightweight client-side React apps
    • React Support: No (manual setup)
    • SSR Support: No
    • Routing: Manual via React Router
    • Data Loading: React Router loaders
    • Type Safety: Yes (through React Router)
    • Drawbacks: Requires manual setup for SSR, less opinionated than other frameworks

    Each of these Next.js alternatives offers unique features and benefits for React developers, providing a range of options depending on your specific project needs and preferences.