Statically typed languages

• Statically typed languages require you to explicitly specify the data type of variables when you declare them.
• Type-checking occurs during compilation, which helps detect errors early on in development.
• Statically typed languages reduce the chances of runtime errors related to type mismatches.
• They increase the readability and predictability of code and often have better IDE support.
• However, statically typed languages tend to be more verbose and may use more boilerplate code, which can be inconvenient for rapid development and daunting for new developers.

Strongly typed languages

• Strongly typed languages enforce strict type rules, ensuring variables are used consistently with their defined types.
• They have a strict adherence to types, which increases code readability and predictability.
• Strongly typed languages often provide better optimization and error detection during compilation.
• However, they can have a steeper learning curve and may require more code duplication.

Leveraging the benefits of strong and static typing with TypeScript

• TypeScript is a statically typed language with a strong type system.
• TypeScript can catch potential bugs during compilation with its strong type system.
• However, TypeScript still provides some flexibility with features like union types, allowing variables to have different types at different times.
• TypeScript also has type inference, where it can deduce a more specific type based on the structure of the code.
• This combination of strong and static typing in TypeScript helps ensure type safety while providing some flexibility.

In conclusion, both strongly typed and statically typed languages have their advantages and considerations. Statically typed languages enforce strict type rules and catch errors early on, while strongly typed languages enhance type safety and code predictability. TypeScript combines the benefits of both strong and static typing, offering flexibility with type inference and union types while still providing strict type checking.